Pepsico Swot Analysis Essay Example for Free

Pepsico Swot Analysis EssayWhen making any investment decision, it is important for a potential investor to gain perceptivity into the fraternity. An evaluation of the play alongs strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats will help the investor determine if the venture is worth going into (Nickels, McHugh McHugh, 2010). It also provides details about the internal status of the stemma and the future(a) growth to expect in the future. SWOT AnalysisConducting a SWOT analysis of PepsiCo will help the company determine where change is possible. If the company is at a turning point, an inventory of its strengths and weaknesses nooky reveal possibilities. The identified strengths can be built on and used to their full potential and makes can be made to reduce the weaknesses. Potential problems that need to be addressed or at least recognized are identified. It will help PepsiCo lay hold of (on what it does surface, could improve, whether they are making the most of the opportunities around them, and whether there are any changes in the market that may require changes in the business (Nickels et al., 2010).StrengthsPepsiCo has a divers(prenominal) product portfolio that includes foods, snacks, and beverages with annual revenue of over $66 billion. The PepsiCo brands such as Pepsi, Gatorade, Tropicana, Mountain Dew, Lays, Aquafina, Sierra Mist, Fritos, and Quaker stand for quality and are well recognized household names. These brands generate over $1 billion each in annual global sales revenue which gives PepsiCo an advantage over its arguing that have limited product line (Brands, 2012).Lower sales in one product line because of unforeseeable circumstances can be moon curser with promoting sales from other product line. PepsiCos geographical footprint is another strength of the organization. It currently operates in more than 200 countries world wide which provides PepsiCo with diverse income sources. In 2011, only 50% of the companys revenue came from the United States but this did not impact PepsiCos overall revenue growth because of the companys increasing revenue from other parts of the world equivalent Asia, Russia, Europe, and Latin America (The Power of PepsiCo, 2012).WeaknessesWith the diverse portfolio of PepsiCo, not all products produced by thiscompany rescue it name and its holdings are still seen by the public as separate entities, not as parts of PepsiCo. Its branding is not obvious and not easily recognized and this is hurting the image of the company. One of its most popular brands, Gatorade, recently changed its name to multiple sub-brands such as G Prime 01, and G serial Pro 03 Recover (Edwards, 2011).PepsiCo is gradually losing its credibility because of its lack of stability in management. The company has a high turnover rate and in the last quaternity years, 26 senior marketing managers have resigned and those that are still with PepsiCo have been moved from one brand to another or from one div ision to another (Edwards, 2012). The revenue of PepsiCo is over dependent on sales to Wal-Mart. In 2011, approximately 18% of PepsiCos North American net revenue was from sales to Wal-Mart (including surface-to-air missiles Club). As a moderate PepsiCo is highly influenced with the business strategies of Wal-Mart (The Power of PepsiCo, 2011).OpportunitiesPepsiCo is investing its resources by expanding its operation in emerging external markets like mainland China and Russia and developing continents like Africa. With the companys recent purchase of Wimm-Bill-Dann, a Russian food and beverage company with huge market shares in dairy farm and juice products, PepsiCo will expand greatly its presence in Eastern Europe and Central Asia and is expected to increase its annual sales revenue by $5 billion (Pepsi Absorbs Wimm, 2011).PepsiCo recently signed a partnership agreement with Theo Muller, a German dairy company to sell its dairy products in the US starting with yogurt. PepsiCo wi ll also invest in research to create new dairy products for the US market. This is a great opportunity for PepsiCo to increase its future revenue because it is predicted that annual revenue of $9 billion will be generated by 2016 with nearly 100 million American households expected to buy yogurt products (Steinberg, 2012).ThreatsPepsiCo faces a strong competition from The Coca-Cola Company, its primary competitor in the carbonate beverage category. These two companies havehad a long history of rivalry since the 1800s with Coca-Cola has a leader for most of the period. PepsiCo recently lost its five-year partnership deal with Dunkin Brands to Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola products will now be offered in 7,000 Dunkin brands outlets instead of PepsiCo products. In January 2012, Dunkin Brands announced the plan to image their outlet stores to 14,000 over the next 20 years. This is a huge revenue loss for PepsiCo (Fisher, 2012). Also in 2010, Diet Coke overtook Pepsi to become the second largest pappa brand in the Unites States behind Coke, moving Pepsi to third (Theodore, 2012).There has been a steady decline in carbonated drink sales for the past heptad years in the US with total sales dropping one percent in 2011. Americans are now turning to healthier food and drinks like bottled waters to avoid the high sugar contents in soda (Soda Sales Fall, 2012). Even with the diverse portfolio of PepsiCo, this decline in sales of carbonated soda drinks will have a negative impact on its total revenue.United States federal, State, and local laws and other regulatory authority in foreign countries could have a negative impact on the sales and profitability of PepsiCo. PepsiCos marketing, manufacturing, and distribution of its products can be affected as a result of what the government dictates. Also Governmental agencies that exist where PepsiCo operates can impose new labeling, accounting standards, product requirement, marketing practices, and taxation requirement. In Californi a, PepsiCo is required to post a warning label on any product sold that contains a substance that the state has found to cause cancer or birth defect. If this casing of law is enacted in other states or foreign countries, it would affect the sales of PepsiCo products (The Power of PepsiCo, 2011).Investor AnalysisAs a result of the SWOT analysis, investing in PepsiCo would yield a positive return on investment. The analysis shows a strong company with increase in earnings for the past five years. PepsiCos increasing presence in developing countries is most relevant in the decision to invest. With nearly 72% of the worlds processed food consumption in 2050 predicted to behappening in developing countries because of increase in population, this will give PepsiCo a competitive edge.Internal and External StakeholdersThe success or failure of PepsiCo is determined by how the wants and needs of its internal and external stakeholders are met. The internal stakeholders of PepsiCo are assoc iates, shareholders, and board of directors. The external stakeholders of PepsiCo are consumers, local and foreign communities, sell and food service customers, partners, suppliers, and competitors.PepsiCo meets the needs of its associates by providing a stand-inive and empowering workplace. The company helps its employees to succeed by helping them develop the skills needed to increase the growth of the company (Talent Sustainability, 2012).The need of the shareholders of PepsiCo is met by striving to deliver top of the line financial performance and providing a high return on their investment (Performance, 2012). In 2011, the dividends paid to PepsiCos shareholders was six percent higher than 2010 ((The Power of PepsiCo, 2011).PepsiCo provides its consumers with a diverse list of products that delivers affordability and great taste. The company has recently begun offering consumers a wide range of healthy foods and beverages. Current products are constantly been improved and new products created to meet the changing needs of consumers (Stakeholders Engagement, 2012).Local jobs are created in the developing countries that PepsiCo operates in. PepsiCo provides support for education through PepsiCo Foundation grants. The company is working to protect the water resources they have used in India and working with nonprofit organizations to promote sustainable countrified practices (Stakeholders Engagement 2012).Products are delivered directly to retail and food service customers such as grocery stores, gas stations, restaurants, and vending machines. PepsiCoalso assist these stakeholders with marketing go that contributes to the customers growth and profit (Stakeholders Engagement, 2012).ConclusionA companys strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats must be analyzed to determine the potential of the return on investment. Even with its weaknesses, PepsiCo is a strong company with earnings growth over the past five years, and has enough cash on hand to ma intain its operation. With the new initiatives that PepsiCo is working on, such as expanding its market into developing countries and providing healthier options to its consumers, the company will be able to meet the needs of its stakeholders.ReferencesBrands. (2012) Retrieved fromhttp//www.pepsico.com/Brands.htmlDiet Mountain Dew, Brisk and Starbucks Ready-T0-Drink Beverages Grow to the Billion-DollarBrands for PepsiCo. (2012, January 26) Retrieved fromhttp//seekingalpha.com/news-article/2139612-diet-mountain-dew-brisk-and-starbucks-ready-to-drink-beverages-grow-to-be-billion-dollar-brands-for-pepsico Edwards, J. (2011, June 22). Pepsi only when Cant Stop Pulling the Tab After Shaking Up Management. Retrieved fromhttp//www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-42749107/pepsi-just-cant-stop-pulling-the-tab-after-shaking-up-management/ Edwards, J. (2012, May 10). How Pepsi Management Shuffles Led To Sales Collapse.Retrieved fromhttp//www.businessinsider.com/how-pepsis-management-shuffles-led- to-sales-collapse-2012-5?op=1 Fisher, B. (2012, June 12). Pepsi loses Dunkin, Eyes appear Markets. Retrieved from http//beta.fool.com/bobbyfisher/2012/06/12/pepsi-loses-dunkin-eyes-emerging-markets/5599/?logvisit=ysource=eptcnnlnk0000001 Nickels, W. G., McHugh, J. M., McHugh, S. M. (2010). Understanding Business (9thed.). New York, NY McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Pepsi Absorbs Wimm-Bill-Dann. (2011) Retrieved fromhttp//rt.com/business/news/pepsi-absorbs-wimm-bill-dann-333/ Performance. (2012) Retrieved fromhttp//www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Performance-with-Purpose.html Stakeholder Engagement. (2012) Retrieved fromhttp//www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Overview/Stakeholder-Engagement.html Steinberg, J. (2012, July 11). PepsiCo Expanding Its American Portfolio With Dairy Products.Retrieved fromhttp//seekingalpha.com/article/714491-pepsico-expanding-its-american-portfolio-with-dairy-products Talent Sustainability. (2012) Retrieved fromhttp//www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Talent-Sustainability.htmlThe Power of Peps iCo 2011 annual Report. (2011) Retrieved from http//www.pepsico.com/annual11/downloads/pep_ar11_2011_annual_report.pdf Theodore, S. (2012, August 13). Diet Coke Enters A New Decade The Carbonated Soft DrinkBrand Has Come A Long Way. Retrieved fromhttp//www.mintel.com/blog/diet-coke-enters-new-decade-carbonated-soft-drink-brand-has-come-long-way Tomlinson, S. (2012, ring 3). Soda Sales Fall Faster As Americans Turn To Healthier Options. Retrieved fromhttp//www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2118291/Soda-sales-fall-faster-Americans-turn-healthier-options.html